PROs: Eliminate the criminal activity and increase associated industry jobs and tax revenues. CONs: Likely to substantially increase drug sales and consumption, as well as public health and safety harms in the population as more people use it.
What are the pros of legalizing drugs?
The legalization of drugs would prevent our civil liberties from being threatened any further, it would reduce crime rates, re- verse the potency effect, improve the quality of life in the inner cities, prevent the spread of disease, save the taxpayer money, and generally benefit both individuals and the community as a …
What are the effects of drug legalization?
Advocates of drug legalization believe that making high-quality drugs cheaply and widely available will eliminate the illegal drug market, regulate quality and price, and decrease law enforcement costs including arrest and incarceration.
Does legalizing drugs reduce crime?
Recent research has shown that legalizing marijuana reduces violence and trafficking associated with the illegal drug trade thereby reducing the power and wealth of cartels and drug gangs. On top of reducing drug related crime, legalizing marijuana has shown to be a meaningful avenue of raising tax revenue.
Why should we legalize Marijuanas?
Proponents of legalizing recreational marijuana say it will add billions to the economy, create hundreds of thousands of jobs, free up scarce police resources, and stop the huge racial disparities in marijuana enforcement.
Have any countries legalized all drugs?
In 2001, Portugal became the first European country to abolish all criminal penalties for personal drug possession, under Law 30/2000. In addition, drug users were to be provided with therapy rather than prison sentences.
What are the CONs of legalizing drugs?
CONs: On the downside, because psychoactive drugs, including marijuana, do cause acute psychological impairments when people use the drug, as well as addiction (about 9% of marijuana users), the increased accessibility, de-stigmatization, and decreased price that comes with legalization, would result in more users and …
What was the first drug?
The first synthetic drug, chloral hydrate, was discovered in 1869 and introduced as a sedative-hypnotic; it is still available today in some countries.
Why should not Marijuanas be legalized?
Since legalization of marijuana for medical or general use would increase marijuana use rather than reduce it and would lead to increased rates of addiction to marijuana among youth and adults, legalizing marijuana is not a smart public health or public safety strategy for any state or for our nation.
What makes a drug illegal?
Legal drugs can either be bought over-the-counter or with a prescription from a medical doctor. Illegal drugs cannot legally be manufactured, bought or sold in the United States. And some other drugs are legal in some situations but illegal when abused.
What if all drugs were legal?
Drugs would become much cheaper-at least one-fifth the cost. Then five times as many people could and would buy them. We would then have five times as many addicts. This means instead of only 100,000 addicted babies being born to addicted mothers each year, we would have half a million.
Why was the first place illegal?
For Western states, a driving reason was a fear of Mexican immigrants who used the plant. In Eastern states, it was fear of African Americans and jazz musicians who used cannabis to “take advantage of white women.” Making marijuana illegal was essentially a way to outlaw being an immigrant or not white.
What do cannabinoids do to the body?
Cannabinoids — the active chemicals in medical marijuana — are similar to chemicals the body makes that are involved in appetite, memory, movement, and pain. Research suggests cannabinoids might: Reduce anxiety. Reduce inflammation and relieve pain.
What is difference between decriminalization and legalization?
Legalization of cannabis is the process of removing all legal prohibitions against it. … Decriminalization of cannabis means it would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for possession under a specified amount.